Close this search box.


governance and culture


Modern governance is perhaps moving into its post-modern era. It’s shifting, often ill-defined and somewhat troublesome. Recently, regulators, movements and academics around the world have been recognising that current codification is adding little to resolve the corporate failures and corporate ethical issues.


Much of the focus of corporate governance codes around the world is to negate the ‘agency problem’ identified by Jensen and Meckling in 1976. Fully negating or de-risking this ‘agency problem’, however, is a challenge, and other theories of governance, such as Stewardship (Davis et al, 1997), have begun to consider this problem to be more human.


Bartlett and Ghoshal (1994) were maybe not the first, but they pushed academics to take a good look at organisational ‘purpose’ and suggested that it could be the driver to effective strategic management. They noted a shift from the “old doctrine of strategy, structure, and systems” to “a softer, more organic model built on the development of purpose, process, and people.” They argued that the principal responsibility of the board is not solely to develop strategy, but to instil a unified sense of ‘purpose’ across and through an organisation.


Read more here.

The problem

Governance is inherently very difficult to measure (Darko et al, 2014) and the codification of corporate governance has also led organisations to slide towards a ‘tick box’ approach, despite the requirements for ‘comply or explain’ statements in certain countries.


The measures that do exist are simply not enough, and in fact, don’t really get at the heart of the question, “how well are both the organisation, and the people within the organisation, ‘being steered’ and how well are they ‘steering’?”.


Most measures of corporate governance focus on compliance related issues. Numerous rating models also seem to focus on the inputs of governance, such as the composition of boards and the separation of the CEO and chairman roles and diversity.


All admirable, however, Argüden (2010) argues that these measures simply do not pay sufficient attention to the quality of information, decision-making processes, nor do they link the effectiveness of governance to output measures such as the brand image, employee and customer satisfaction indices, or profitability and value creation.

Our invitation

We are on a road of discovery through research and learning. This programme will focus on exploring the interconnections between organisational culture, the quality and ethics of decision-making and the operational efficacy and performance within organisations.


We are seeking organisations to participate in this research and to therefore contribute to developing a practical, more human and more scientific approach to measuring organisational governance linked to purpose, values and behaviours.


Want to know more? Then sign up here.


To participate in the research data set, 


please click the CoSteer Contact Page here and add the message “I’m part of the GGA Research Forum, please send me a link to the research survey, thank you”.

Related papers

“Some of the strongest relationships we see are between empathic leadership, living values and interestingly the quality of information available for decision-making”
Perrin Carey | Founder of CoSteer

In this insight, we look at the relationship between empathic leadership and an organisation’s performance and culture. We discuss ‘building trust’ and three aspects that can help leaders develop strong trusting relationships in their organisations.


Forum leader

Comments from our events

Great presentation! 

Best Zoom room to hang out for 60 minutes – I’m so in my happy place!

Very inspiring.

A simple but effective approach to Governance

Impressive and a very sensible presentation

Brings a lot of clarity to human behavior.

Past events

Interconnecting governance and culture.

11 August 2022

Connecting culture, decision-making, efficacy and performance.

27 September 2022

Measuring governance complexity and unveiling relationships.

19 January 2023

Connecting inclusivity with decision-making and governance.

7 February 2024

Wits Business School, 2 St Davids Pl, St Andrew Rd, Parktown, 

Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa

Follow us on

© 2024 Good Governance Academy

Perrin Carey

PG Cert (Corp Gov), B.Sc (Hons). FICA

Perrin graduated with a post-graduate qualification in Corporate Governance from Bournemouth University in the U.K. and is a speaker and author in the field of governance and organisational culture. He’s passionate about making the world a better place by improving the governance within organisations. He is currently involved in research exploring the interconnections between, organisational culture, ethical decision-making and organisational performance.

Professionally qualified (Dip(Comp)), Fellow of the International Compliance Association (FICA) and experienced senior executive who has worked in compliance, risk management, governance and quality assurance for 20 years. This has involved financial services institutions, eGaming, UK Higher Education institutions, global education providers, and the Guernsey Financial Services Commission.

Perrin is a founder and the CEO of CoSteer®, who are the creators of their proprietary technology, GOVindicia®, which measures governance using human data and an evidenced-based, scientific methodology.

Terms and Conditions

  • The Good Governance Academy nor any of its agents or representatives shall be liable for any damage, loss or liability arising from the use or inability to use this web site or the services or content provided from and through this web site.
  • This web site is supplied on an “as is” basis and has not been compiled or supplied to meet the user’s individual requirements. It is the sole responsibility of the user to satisfy itself prior to entering into this agreement with The Good Governance Academy that the service available from and through this web site will meet the user’s individual requirements and be compatible with the user’s hardware and/or software.
  • Information, ideas and opinions expressed on this site should not be regarded as professional advice or the official opinion of The Good Governance Academy and users are encouraged to consult professional advice before taking any course of action related to information, ideas or opinions expressed on this site.
  • When this site collects private information from users, such information shall not be disclosed to any third party unless agreed upon between the user and The Good Governance Academy.
  • The Good Governance Academy may, in its sole discretion, change this agreement or any part thereof at any time without notice.

Privacy Policy

Link to the policy: GGA Privacy Policy 2021

The Good Governance Academy (“GGA”) strives for transparency and trust when it comes to protecting your privacy and we aim to clearly explain how we collect and process your information.

It’s important to us that you should enjoy using our products, services and website(s) without compromising your privacy in any way. The policy outlines how we collect and use different types of personal and behavioural information, and the reasons for doing so. You have the right to access, change or delete your personal information at any time and you can find out more about this and your rights by contacting the GGA, clicking on the “CONTACT” menu item or using the details at the bottom of the page.

The policy applies to “users” (or “you”) of the GGA website(s) or any GGA product or service; that is anyone attending, registering or interacting with any product or service from the GGA. This includes event attendees, participants, registrants, website users, app users and the like.

Our policies are updated from time-to-time. Please refer back regularly to keep yourself updated.