Taking the Helm

Chairing a strategic transformation

This second episode in our series Taking the Helm with Prof Mervyn King is a must for leaders, board chairs, and executives navigating complex organizational change.

This session explores the critical role of the chair in driving strategic transformation, providing practical insights on leadership, governance, and decision-making in times of change. Real-world experiences, best practices, and key strategies to ensure boards effectively steer their organizations toward long-term success are discussed.

Questions and Answers

The primary responsibility of a board chair during a strategic transformation is to ensure that the board has a unified collective mind in making business judgment calls. This involves offline discussions with directors to agree on fundamental aspects such as the company’s purpose, value drivers, key stakeholders and their expectations, key risk and performance indicators, and the company culture and characteristics. The chair facilitates the development and agreement of overarching organisational goals for the transformation and ensures the board collectively buys into these goals before strategies for achieving them are implemented. The chair also plays a crucial role as a confidant to the chief executive, especially in sensitive matters, and often takes on difficult stakeholder communication responsibilities.

A unified collective mind on the board is crucial because strategic transformation requires significant and potentially disruptive changes. When the board operates with a shared understanding of the company’s direction, objectives, and the rationale behind the transformation, it can make cohesive and effective decisions. This unity provides a strong foundation for navigating challenges, gaining the necessary buy-in from the wider organisation and stakeholders, and ultimately increasing the likelihood of successful implementation. Without a unified mind, the board risks internal conflict, indecisiveness, and a lack of clear direction, which can derail even the most well-intentioned transformation efforts.

The relationship between the chair and the chief executive is critical. They typically go “offline” to collaboratively assess the current situation, define the necessary organisational goals to address challenges or opportunities, and develop a preliminary vision for the transformation. The chief executive, with their detailed operational knowledge, and the chair, with their broader governance perspective, work together to formulate a plan. This shared understanding and alignment at the top are essential before presenting the proposed transformation and organisational goals to the full board for discussion and agreement. The chair also acts as a sounding board and confidant for the CEO throughout the transformation process.

Organisational goals define the desired end state of the strategic transformation – the “what” the company aims to achieve. These goals should be clear, ambitious, and aligned with the company’s purpose and long-term sustainability. Strategies, on the other hand, outline the “how” the company will achieve these goals. They are the specific plans and actions that will be taken. The organisational goals provide the overarching direction, while the strategies are more flexible and may need to be adjusted in response to unforeseen circumstances. The chair ensures that the board keeps the organisational goals firmly in mind while being adaptable in its approach to the evolving strategies.

Significant workforce reductions are a sensitive and often necessary part of strategic transformation. The board, led by the chair, must approach this with careful consideration for the impact on employees and other stakeholders. This involves exploring alternatives, providing fair retrenchment packages, and ideally, exploring ways to mitigate the impact, such as creating new opportunities or supporting affected individuals. Transparent communication and a demonstration of empathy are crucial. The board may also need to engage with unions and local communities to explain the rationale behind the changes and to seek constructive solutions, as illustrated by the example of creating the Zenzelini business.

While boards can delegate specific tasks to committees like a strategic committee to oversee certain aspects of a transformation, the ultimate responsibility for the strategic direction and outcomes remains with the full board. The board cannot simply “rubber stamp” the recommendations of a committee. It is essential for all directors to actively engage with and interrogate the information and proposals coming from committees, apply their own independent judgment, and satisfy themselves that the proposed actions are in the best long-term interests of the company. Committees can provide valuable focus and expertise, but the final decisions and accountability rest with the entire board.

While deep industry-specific experience isn’t strictly essential, a board chair undertaking a strategic transformation must possess a strong understanding of the business and be willing to learn and familiarise themselves with the relevant industry dynamics, technologies, and key drivers. Thorough induction and open communication with experienced executives are crucial. A chair needs to be able to comprehend the core aspects of the business to effectively guide strategic discussions, challenge assumptions, and contribute meaningfully to decision-making. If a chair lacks this fundamental understanding and fails to gain it, they risk making ineffective or even detrimental decisions.

Several broader governance principles are crucial. These include recognising the company as a responsible citizen and considering the needs, interests, and expectations of all stakeholders, not just shareholders. The chair must foster a culture of fairness and transparency, ensuring that business judgment calls are made in the long-term best interest of the company, which ultimately benefits all stakeholders. This involves balancing economic, social, and environmental considerations to achieve sustainable development. The chair’s leadership should promote ethical conduct, robust internal controls, and a long-term perspective that prioritises the health and longevity of the organisation over short-term gains.

Our hosts

Prof. Mervyn King

Patron, Good Governance Academy

Mervyn King is a Senior Counsel, former Judge of the Supreme Court of South Africa, and designated Chartered Director (South Africa). He is Professor Extraordinaire at the University of South Africa, Honorary Professor at the Universities of Pretoria and Cape Town, and a Visiting Professor at Rhodes University. He has honorary Doctorates from Wits University and Stellenbosch University in South Africa, Leeds University in the UK, and Deakin University in Australia.

 

Mervyn is honorary fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales; the Institute of Internal Auditors of the UK; the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants; the Certified Public Accountants of Australia; the Chartered Institute of Public Relations of the UK, and the Chartered Secretaries and Administrators.

 

Mervyn is Chair Emeritus of the King Committee on Corporate Governance in South Africa, as well as of the Value Reporting Foundation (incorporating the International Integrated Reporting Council and SASB) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). He has received Lifetime Achievement Awards for promoting quality corporate governance globally, from several institutions.

 

Mervyn chairs the Good Law Foundation and has chaired the United Nations Committee of Eminent persons on Governance and Oversight. He is a member of the Private Sector Advisory Group to the World Bank on Corporate Governance and of the ICC Court of Arbitration in Paris. Mervyn currently chairs the African Integrated Reporting Council and the Integrated Reporting Committee of South Africa and is Patron of the Good Governance Academy.

 

Mervyn has been a chair, director and chief executive of several companies listed on the London, Luxembourg and Johannesburg Stock Exchanges. He has consulted, advised and spoken on legal, business, advertising, sustainability and corporate governance issues in over 60 countries and has received many awards from international bodies around the world including the World Federation of Stock Exchanges and the International Federation of Accountants.

 

He is the author of many books on governance, sustainability and reporting, the latest being “The Healthy Company.”

Carolynn Chalmers

Chief Executive Officer, Good Governance Academy

Carolynn Chalmers is the Chief Executive Officer of Professor Mervyn King’s Good Governance Academy and its initiative, The ESG Exchange. She has edited two international standards: ISO 37000:2021 – Governance of organizations – Guidance and its associated Governance Maturity Model, ISO 37004:2023.

 

Carolynn makes corporate dreams come true, assisting leaders and leadership teams in how to create value for their organisations. She makes use of her expertise and experience in corporate governance, organizational strategy, Digital Transformation, and IT to do so.

 

Carolynn is an Independent Committee Member of South Africa’s largest private Pension Fund, the Eskom Pension and Provident Fund, and recently retired as Independent Committee member of several board committees for the Government Employee Medical Scheme. Carolynn has extensive management, assurance and governance experience and has held various Executive roles for international, listed, private and public organisations across many industries.

 

Carolynn is best known for her successes in establishing governance frameworks, and designing and the leading large, complex initiatives that can result. She attributes this success to the application of good governance principles. She shares her insights on her 2 LinkedIn Groups – Applying King IV and Corporate Governance Institute. 

Terms and Conditions

  • The Good Governance Academy nor any of its agents or representatives shall be liable for any damage, loss or liability arising from the use or inability to use this web site or the services or content provided from and through this web site.
  • This web site is supplied on an “as is” basis and has not been compiled or supplied to meet the user’s individual requirements. It is the sole responsibility of the user to satisfy itself prior to entering into this agreement with The Good Governance Academy that the service available from and through this web site will meet the user’s individual requirements and be compatible with the user’s hardware and/or software.
  • Information, ideas and opinions expressed on this site should not be regarded as professional advice or the official opinion of The Good Governance Academy and users are encouraged to consult professional advice before taking any course of action related to information, ideas or opinions expressed on this site.
  • When this site collects private information from users, such information shall not be disclosed to any third party unless agreed upon between the user and The Good Governance Academy.
  • The Good Governance Academy may, in its sole discretion, change this agreement or any part thereof at any time without notice.

Privacy Policy

Link to the policy: GGA Privacy Policy 2021

The Good Governance Academy (“GGA”) strives for transparency and trust when it comes to protecting your privacy and we aim to clearly explain how we collect and process your information.

It’s important to us that you should enjoy using our products, services and website(s) without compromising your privacy in any way. The policy outlines how we collect and use different types of personal and behavioural information, and the reasons for doing so. You have the right to access, change or delete your personal information at any time and you can find out more about this and your rights by contacting the GGA, clicking on the “CONTACT” menu item or using the details at the bottom of the page.

The policy applies to “users” (or “you”) of the GGA website(s) or any GGA product or service; that is anyone attending, registering or interacting with any product or service from the GGA. This includes event attendees, participants, registrants, website users, app users and the like.

Our policies are updated from time-to-time. Please refer back regularly to keep yourself updated.

Dr Lindie Grebe

Senior Lecturer, College of Accounting Sciences, University of South Africa

Dr Grebe is a chartered accountant and senior lecturer at the University of South Africa (Unisa). 

 

She teaches postgraduate accounting sciences through blended learning using technology in distance education, and through face-to-face study schools throughout South Africa. During her employment at Unisa, she also acted as Coordinator: Master’s and Doctoral Degrees for the College of Accounting Sciences (CAS), chairperson of the research ethics committee and chairperson of the Gauteng North Region of the Southern African Accounting Association (SAAA). 

 

Before joining Unisa as academic, she gained ten years’ experience in audit practice and in commerce.